- 17 Aug, 2020 8 commits
-
-
Federico Vaga authored
Signed-off-by: Federico Vaga <federico.vaga@cern.ch>
-
Federico Vaga authored
Signed-off-by: Federico Vaga <federico.vaga@cern.ch>
-
Federico Vaga authored
Signed-off-by: Federico Vaga <federico.vaga@cern.ch>
-
Federico Vaga authored
Fix the Id table
-
Federico Vaga authored
-
Federico Vaga authored
Signed-off-by: Federico Vaga <federico.vaga@cern.ch>
-
Federico Vaga authored
FMC ADC 100M 14bit 4 channel v5.0.0 release candidate 5
-
Federico Vaga authored
-
- 13 Aug, 2020 15 commits
-
-
Federico Vaga authored
Signed-off-by: Federico Vaga <federico.vaga@cern.ch>
-
Federico Vaga authored
Signed-off-by: Federico Vaga <federico.vaga@cern.ch>
-
Federico Vaga authored
Signed-off-by: Federico Vaga <federico.vaga@cern.ch>
-
Federico Vaga authored
Signed-off-by: Federico Vaga <federico.vaga@cern.ch>
-
Federico Vaga authored
We can calibrate a single channel independently from the others Signed-off-by: Federico Vaga <federico.vaga@cern.ch>
-
Federico Vaga authored
Signed-off-by: Federico Vaga <federico.vaga@cern.ch>
-
Federico Vaga authored
Actually it is true that the ADC PTS uses centi-celsious as temperature unit. Sad but true. Signed-off-by: Federico Vaga <federico.vaga@cern.ch>
-
Federico Vaga authored
Signed-off-by: Federico Vaga <federico.vaga@cern.ch>
-
Federico Vaga authored
Signed-off-by: Federico Vaga <federico.vaga@cern.ch>
-
Federico Vaga authored
Signed-off-by: Federico Vaga <federico.vaga@cern.ch>
-
Federico Vaga authored
Signed-off-by: Federico Vaga <federico.vaga@cern.ch>
-
Federico Vaga authored
Signed-off-by: Federico Vaga <federico.vaga@cern.ch>
-
Federico Vaga authored
It is important because we enter and exit the calibration part whenever we probe()/remove() a device driver instance, or when we set/unset the ADC pattern data. For the second it is important to have the calibration identity in place. Signed-off-by: Federico Vaga <federico.vaga@cern.ch>
-
Federico Vaga authored
Signed-off-by: Federico Vaga <federico.vaga@cern.ch>
-
Federico Vaga authored
Signed-off-by: Federico Vaga <federico.vaga@cern.ch>
-
- 12 Aug, 2020 6 commits
-
-
Federico Vaga authored
Signed-off-by: Federico Vaga <federico.vaga@cern.ch>
-
Federico Vaga authored
Do not use any calibration data while there is a pattern applied Signed-off-by: Federico Vaga <federico.vaga@cern.ch>
-
Federico Vaga authored
Signed-off-by: Federico Vaga <federico.vaga@cern.ch>
-
Federico Vaga authored
Signed-off-by: Federico Vaga <federico.vaga@cern.ch>
-
Federico Vaga authored
Signed-off-by: Federico Vaga <federico.vaga@cern.ch>
-
Federico Vaga authored
Signed-off-by: Federico Vaga <federico.vaga@cern.ch>
-
- 11 Aug, 2020 4 commits
-
-
Federico Vaga authored
Signed-off-by: Federico Vaga <federico.vaga@cern.ch>
-
Federico Vaga authored
Signed-off-by: Federico Vaga <federico.vaga@cern.ch>
-
Federico Vaga authored
Signed-off-by: Federico Vaga <federico.vaga@cern.ch>
-
Federico Vaga authored
Signed-off-by: Federico Vaga <federico.vaga@cern.ch>
-
- 10 Aug, 2020 3 commits
-
-
Federico Vaga authored
We computed good values for the slope's tables with two aims: - having proper integer math - having the values in the same range as the calibration data Signed-off-by: Federico Vaga <federico.vaga@cern.ch>
-
Federico Vaga authored
Signed-off-by: Federico Vaga <federico.vaga@cern.ch>
-
Federico Vaga authored
Signed-off-by: Federico Vaga <federico.vaga@cern.ch>
-
- 06 Aug, 2020 4 commits
-
-
Federico Vaga authored
-
Federico Vaga authored
the offset user input is validated; in fa_dac_offset_get() there is a paranoid check; if the offset is still out of range, then there is something big and wrong somewhere. Signed-off-by: Federico Vaga <federico.vaga@cern.ch>
-
Federico Vaga authored
Signed-off-by: Federico Vaga <federico.vaga@cern.ch>
-
Federico Vaga authored
Signed-off-by: Federico Vaga <federico.vaga@cern.ch>
-