Skip to content
GitLab
Explore
Sign in
Primary navigation
Search or go to…
Project
W
White Rabbit core collection
Manage
Activity
Members
Labels
Plan
Issues
33
Issue boards
Milestones
Wiki
Code
Merge requests
3
Repository
Branches
Commits
Tags
Repository graph
Compare revisions
Deploy
Releases
Monitor
Incidents
Service Desk
Analyze
Value stream analytics
Contributor analytics
Repository analytics
Model experiments
Help
Help
Support
GitLab documentation
Compare GitLab plans
Community forum
Contribute to GitLab
Provide feedback
Keyboard shortcuts
?
Snippets
Groups
Projects
Projects
White Rabbit core collection
Commits
72ccb5ff
Commit
72ccb5ff
authored
13 years ago
by
Tomasz Wlostowski
Browse files
Options
Downloads
Patches
Plain Diff
endpoint/ep_rx_crc_size_check: missing OOB bugfix
parent
292327c2
Branches
Branches containing commit
Tags
Tags containing commit
No related merge requests found
Changes
1
Hide whitespace changes
Inline
Side-by-side
Showing
1 changed file
modules/wr_endpoint/ep_rx_crc_size_check.vhd
+3
-2
3 additions, 2 deletions
modules/wr_endpoint/ep_rx_crc_size_check.vhd
with
3 additions
and
2 deletions
modules/wr_endpoint/ep_rx_crc_size_check.vhd
+
3
−
2
View file @
72ccb5ff
...
...
@@ -68,7 +68,7 @@ architecture behavioral of ep_rx_crc_size_check is
signal
q_bytesel
:
std_logic
;
signal
q_dvalid_in
:
std_logic
;
signal
q_dvalid_out
:
std_logic
;
signal
q_dreq_out
:
std_logic
;
signal
dvalid_mask
:
std_logic_vector
(
1
downto
0
);
begin
-- behavioral
...
...
@@ -107,7 +107,7 @@ begin -- behavioral
clk_i
=>
clk_sys_i
,
d_i
=>
q_in
,
valid_i
=>
q_dvalid_in
,
dreq_o
=>
snk
_dreq_o
,
dreq_o
=>
q
_dreq_o
ut
,
q_o
=>
q_out
,
valid_o
=>
q_dvalid_out
,
dreq_i
=>
src_dreq_i
,
...
...
@@ -115,6 +115,7 @@ begin -- behavioral
purge_i
=>
q_purge
,
empty_o
=>
q_empty
);
snk_dreq_o
<=
q_dreq_out
and
not
(
snk_fab_i
.
eof
or
snk_fab_i
.
error
);
p_count_bytes
:
process
(
clk_sys_i
,
rst_n_i
)
...
...
This diff is collapsed.
Click to expand it.
Preview
0%
Try again
or
attach a new file
.
Cancel
You are about to add
0
people
to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Save comment
Cancel
Please
register
or
sign in
to comment