When testing with newer compilers and newlib, a mismatch surfaced in
the definition of intptr_t, int32_t, uint32_t.  I don't know why the
library header gets picked up.

This patch, though ugly, fixes the problem by using the "ifdef" names
found in lm32-elf/include/sys/_stdint.h (the offending file).
Signed-off-by: Alessandro Rubini <rubini@gnudd.com>

If you use CROSS_COMPILE from the environment, the current system will
try to build host code with the lm32 compiler, and the build stops at
the very beginning. This fixes the problem in the most trivial way.
Signed-off-by: Alessandro Rubini <rubini@gnudd.com>

include/storage.h had int, this file had in32_t and newer compilers
complain about that. So now both are int, which fits better.
Signed-off-by: Alessandro Rubini <rubini@gnudd.com>

Signed-off-by: Alessandro Rubini <rubini@gnudd.com>

When testing with newer compilers and newlib, a mismatch surfaced in
the definition of intptr_t, int32_t, uint32_t.  I don't know why the
library header gets picked up.

This patch, though ugly, fixes the problem by using the "ifdef" names
found in lm32-elf/include/sys/_stdint.h (the offending file).
Signed-off-by: Alessandro Rubini <rubini@gnudd.com>

If you use CROSS_COMPILE from the environment, the current system will
try to build host code with the lm32 compiler, and the build stops at
the very beginning. This fixes the problem in the most trivial way.
Signed-off-by: Alessandro Rubini <rubini@gnudd.com>

include/storage.h had int, this file had in32_t and newer compilers
complain about that. So now both are int, which fits better.
Signed-off-by: Alessandro Rubini <rubini@gnudd.com>

Signed-off-by: Alessandro Rubini <rubini@gnudd.com>

Please not that LLDP_TX_TICK_INTERVAL is not about ticks, but about
number of task executions. This should be changed to time.
Signed-off-by: Adam Wujek <adam.wujek@cern.ch>

Change indentation of switch statement.
Signed-off-by: Adam Wujek <adam.wujek@cern.ch>

Signed-off-by: Adam Wujek <adam.wujek@cern.ch>

Signed-off-by: Adam Wujek <adam.wujek@cern.ch>

Signed-off-by: Adam Wujek <adam.wujek@cern.ch>

Signed-off-by: Adam Wujek <adam.wujek@cern.ch>

Signed-off-by: Adam Wujek <adam.wujek@cern.ch>

On VFC-HD reading EEPROM was taking too long. E.g. reading SFP database through
snmp was taking ~0.5s which was enough to break the timestamps for received PTP
frames and thus the timing. See issue 1649 in wr-cores project on OHWR.

Signed-off-by: Adam Wujek <adam.wujek@cern.ch>

Signed-off-by: Adam Wujek <adam.wujek@cern.ch>

There is no ns monotonic counter:(
Signed-off-by: Adam Wujek <adam.wujek@cern.ch>