| ... | ... | @@ -36,14 +36,37 @@ Advantages of standardization: |
|
|
|
- feedback of field's expert
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Standardization is a considerably long process which can be approach in
|
|
|
|
various ways and from various directions. A few potential paths for
|
|
|
|
White Rabbit standardization has been identified. These include:
|
|
|
|
various ways and from various directions. So far, a few potential paths
|
|
|
|
for White Rabbit standardization has been identified. These include:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- Standardization at International Telecommunication Union -
|
|
|
|
Telecommunication Standardization Sector (ITU-T)
|
|
|
|
- within Telecom Profile (G.827x)
|
|
|
|
Telecommunication Standardization Sector (ITU-T),
|
|
|
|
- within Telecom Profile (G.827x) - currently being developed
|
|
|
|
- as a separate Profile (similar to Telecom)
|
|
|
|
- Standardization at Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers
|
|
|
|
(IEEE)
|
|
|
|
- Standard within other standardization body/consortium
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
## Goal of this project
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The ultimate goal of this project is to standardize White Rabbit
|
|
|
|
Protocol.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
## Project's plan
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
\# *White Rabbit Standardization Group* is to be established:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
\* representatives of Scientific Institutes (e.g. CERN, GSI)and
|
|
|
|
companies (e.g. NI)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
\* members of WR Collaboration and external experts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
\* the responsibility of the group is to perform the further actions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. Each potential path for WR standardization needs to be identified,
|
|
|
|
studied and evaluated
|
|
|
|
2. The most suitable path (in terms of costs, efforts, time) should be
|
|
|
|
decided
|
|
|
|
3. The standardization effort should be started
|
|
|
|
4. An official White Rabbit standard will mark the end of the project
|
|
|
|
|
