... | ... | @@ -14,20 +14,21 @@ and is currently defined as a PTP Profile. |
|
|
|
|
|
## White Rabbit Specification (WR Spec)
|
|
|
|
|
|
White Rabbit Protocol is described in **White Rabbit Specification** (WR
|
|
|
Spec) which describes:
|
|
|
White Rabbit Protocol is described in the **White Rabbit Specification**
|
|
|
(WR Spec) which describes:
|
|
|
|
|
|
- hardware requirements which need to be fulfilled to implement WRPTP
|
|
|
- protocol requirements which need to be fulfilled by a device to be
|
|
|
WRPTP-compatible
|
|
|
- protocol implementation requirements which need to be fulfilled to
|
|
|
be WRPTP-compatible
|
|
|
|
|
|
The latest version of WR Spec can be found "here": .
|
|
|
The latest version of WR Spec can be found
|
|
|
[here](https://www.ohwr.org/project/wr-std/wikis/Documents/White-Rabbit-Specification-(latest-version)).
|
|
|
|
|
|
## White Rabbit Standardization
|
|
|
|
|
|
Standardizing White Rabbit is unquestionably beneficial to the project
|
|
|
and is expected to bring substantial boost to the number of applications
|
|
|
of the protocol.
|
|
|
and is expected to bring substantial boost to the number of WR's
|
|
|
applications.
|
|
|
Advantages of standardization:
|
|
|
|
|
|
- easier co-operation with companies
|
... | ... | @@ -35,16 +36,18 @@ Advantages of standardization: |
|
|
solution (favored by the potential users)
|
|
|
- feedback of field's expert
|
|
|
|
|
|
Standardization is a considerably long process which can be approach in
|
|
|
various ways and from various directions. So far, a few potential paths
|
|
|
for White Rabbit standardization has been identified. These include:
|
|
|
Standardization is a considerably long process which can be approached
|
|
|
in various ways and from various directions. So far, a few potential
|
|
|
paths for White Rabbit standardization have been identified. These
|
|
|
include:
|
|
|
|
|
|
- Standardization at International Telecommunication Union -
|
|
|
Telecommunication Standardization Sector (ITU-T),
|
|
|
- [Standardization at International Telecommunication
|
|
|
Union](http://www.itu.int/en/pages/default.aspx) - Telecommunication
|
|
|
Standardization Sector (ITU-T),
|
|
|
- within Telecom Profile (G.827x) - currently being developed
|
|
|
- as a separate Profile (similar to Telecom)
|
|
|
- Standardization at Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers
|
|
|
(IEEE)
|
|
|
- [Standardization at Institute of Electrical and Electronics
|
|
|
Engineers](http://www.ieee.org/index.html) (IEEE)
|
|
|
- Standard within other standardization body/consortium
|
|
|
|
|
|
## Goal of this project
|
... | ... | @@ -54,19 +57,16 @@ Protocol. |
|
|
|
|
|
## Project's plan
|
|
|
|
|
|
\# *White Rabbit Standardization Group* is to be established:
|
|
|
|
|
|
\* representatives of Scientific Institutes (e.g. CERN, GSI)and
|
|
|
companies (e.g. NI)
|
|
|
|
|
|
\* members of WR Collaboration and external experts
|
|
|
|
|
|
\* the responsibility of the group is to perform the further actions
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. Each potential path for WR standardization needs to be identified,
|
|
|
1. *White Rabbit Standardization Group* is to be established:
|
|
|
- representatives of Scientific Institutes (e.g. CERN, GSI) and
|
|
|
companies (e.g. NI)
|
|
|
- members of WR Collaboration and external experts
|
|
|
- the responsibility of the group is to perform the further
|
|
|
actions
|
|
|
2. Each potential path for WR standardization needs to be identified,
|
|
|
studied and evaluated
|
|
|
2. The most suitable path (in terms of costs, efforts, time) should be
|
|
|
3. The most suitable path (in terms of costs, efforts, time) should be
|
|
|
decided
|
|
|
3. The standardization effort should be started
|
|
|
4. An official White Rabbit standard will mark the end of the project
|
|
|
4. The standardization effort should be started
|
|
|
5. An official White Rabbit standard will mark the end of the project
|
|
|
|