Commit 1ebfc52c authored by Grzegorz Daniluk's avatar Grzegorz Daniluk

presentations/robustness_April_2011: use common

parent e32e2b18
...@@ -2,16 +2,12 @@ all : robustness.pdf ...@@ -2,16 +2,12 @@ all : robustness.pdf
.PHONY : all clean .PHONY : all clean
robustness.pdf : robustness.tex figs robustness.pdf : robustness.tex
latex $^ latex $^
latex $^ latex $^
dvips robustness dvips robustness
ps2pdf robustness.ps ps2pdf robustness.ps
figs:
$(MAKE) -C fig
clean : clean :
$(MAKE) clean -C fig rm -f *.eps *.pdf *.dat *.log *.out *.aux *.dvi *.ps *.nav *.snm *.toc
rm -f *.eps *.pdf *.dat *.log *.out *.aux *.dvi *.ps
...@@ -150,13 +150,13 @@ GW of 100$\mu s$ is very tight and needs solid justification. ...@@ -150,13 +150,13 @@ GW of 100$\mu s$ is very tight and needs solid justification.
\label{tab:CMspDelay} \label{tab:CMspDelay}
\end{table} \end{table}
} }
\column{3in} \column{3in}
\includegraphics[height=5.2cm,keepaspectratio]{CMdelayStandard} \includegraphics[height=5.2cm,keepaspectratio]{../../figures/robustness/CMdelayStandard.ps}
\end{columns} \end{columns}
\end{frame} \end{frame}
...@@ -180,13 +180,13 @@ GW of 100$\mu s$ is very tight and needs solid justification. ...@@ -180,13 +180,13 @@ GW of 100$\mu s$ is very tight and needs solid justification.
\centering \centering
\textcolor{red}{DISCUSSION:} \\ \textcolor{red}{DISCUSSION:} \\
Drop on collision, sending of HP by more Data Master and/or nodes. Drop on collision, sending of HP by more Data Master and/or nodes.
\column{2.3in} \column{2.3in}
\centering \centering
\includegraphics[height=4cm,keepaspectratio]{SWhpRouting} \includegraphics[height=4cm,keepaspectratio]{../../figures/robustness/SWhpRouting.ps}
{\tiny {\tiny
\begin{table}[ht] \begin{table}[ht]
%\centering %\centering
\begin{tabular}{| c | c | c | c |} \hline \begin{tabular}{| c | c | c | c |} \hline
\textbf{CM size}& \multicolumn{2}{|c|}{\textbf{CM Delivery Delay}}\\ \textbf{CM size}& \multicolumn{2}{|c|}{\textbf{CM Delivery Delay}}\\
& GSI & CERN \\ \hline & GSI & CERN \\ \hline
...@@ -303,26 +303,26 @@ Triple-redundancy & 495 & 2048 ...@@ -303,26 +303,26 @@ Triple-redundancy & 495 & 2048
\item The redundancy of the WRN is justified only if Data Master is \item The redundancy of the WRN is justified only if Data Master is
highly reliable or redundant. highly reliable or redundant.
\end{itemize} \end{itemize}
\column{1.2in} \column{1.2in}
\centering \centering
\includegraphics[height=5cm,keepaspectratio]{inOutOfWRN} \includegraphics[height=5cm,keepaspectratio]{../../figures/robustness/inOutOfWRN.ps}
\end{columns} \end{columns}
\centering \centering
\textcolor{red}{DISCUSSION:} \\ \textcolor{red}{DISCUSSION:} \\
Redundant connection to WR nodes. Redundant connection to WR nodes.
\end{frame} \end{frame}
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
\begin{frame} \begin{frame}
\frametitle{Triple-redundancy of topology} \frametitle{Triple-redundancy of topology}
\centering \centering
\includegraphics[height=4cm,keepaspectratio]{tripleTopology} \includegraphics[height=4cm,keepaspectratio]{../../figures/robustness/tripleTopology}
\begin{itemize} \begin{itemize}
\item For $\approx$2000 WR nodes connected to two layers of switches, \item For $\approx$2000 WR nodes connected to two layers of switches,
15 switches in L0, 80 in L1 and 400 in L2 are required (total 495) 15 switches in L0, 80 in L1 and 400 in L2 are required (total 495)
\end{itemize} \end{itemize}
...@@ -348,13 +348,13 @@ Redundant connection to WR nodes. ...@@ -348,13 +348,13 @@ Redundant connection to WR nodes.
possible topologies. possible topologies.
\end{itemize} \end{itemize}
\column{1.2in} \column{1.2in}
\centering \centering
\includegraphics[height=5cm,keepaspectratio]{RSTPcomplex} \includegraphics[height=5cm,keepaspectratio]{../../figures/robustness/RSTPcomplex.ps}
\end{columns} \end{columns}
\centering \centering
\textcolor{red}{DISCUSSION:} \\ \textcolor{red}{DISCUSSION:} \\
Ring topology - impossible with current approach, is it worth considering, what Ring topology - impossible with current approach, is it worth considering, what
is the feasibility of ring WRN? is the feasibility of ring WRN?
...@@ -365,22 +365,22 @@ is the feasibility of ring WRN? ...@@ -365,22 +365,22 @@ is the feasibility of ring WRN?
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
\begin{frame} \begin{frame}
\frametitle{WR RSTP -- theoretical consideration} \frametitle{WR RSTP -- theoretical consideration}
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
\centering \centering
\includegraphics[height=5cm,keepaspectratio]{RSTPsimple} \includegraphics[height=5cm,keepaspectratio]{../../figures/robustness/RSTPsimple.ps}
\end{frame} \end{frame}
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
\begin{frame} \begin{frame}
\frametitle{WR RSTP -- real-life consideration} \frametitle{WR RSTP -- real-life consideration}
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
\centering \centering
\includegraphics[height=5cm,keepaspectratio]{RSTPcomplex2} \includegraphics[height=5cm,keepaspectratio]{../../figures/robustness/RSTPcomplex2.ps}
\begin{itemize} \begin{itemize}
\item Introducing maximum cut-through delay (13$us$) on backup ports of the \item Introducing maximum cut-through delay (13$us$) on backup ports of the
switch. switch.
\item Backup link always 1 hoop longer then active. \item Backup link always 1 hoop longer then active.
\end{itemize} \end{itemize}
...@@ -416,13 +416,13 @@ How do we indicate that FEC is to be used? EtherType? WB special reg? ...@@ -416,13 +416,13 @@ How do we indicate that FEC is to be used? EtherType? WB special reg?
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
\begin{frame} \begin{frame}
\frametitle{Flow and Congestion Control } \frametitle{Flow and Congestion Control }
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
\centering \centering
\includegraphics[height=7cm,keepaspectratio]{FECflow} \includegraphics[height=7cm,keepaspectratio]{../../figures/robustness/FECflow.ps}
\end{frame} \end{frame}
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
\begin{frame} \begin{frame}
...@@ -447,13 +447,13 @@ Cesar's playground... ...@@ -447,13 +447,13 @@ Cesar's playground...
\item Detection of lost HP Frames (in WR Switches) using FEC ID and CM ID \item Detection of lost HP Frames (in WR Switches) using FEC ID and CM ID
(stored in the header added by FEC). (stored in the header added by FEC).
\item Precise knowledge of HP traffic delays on the path DataMaster $<->$ Node. \item Precise knowledge of HP traffic delays on the path DataMaster $<->$ Node.
\item Monitoring of WRPTP parameters. \item Monitoring of WRPTP parameters.
\end{itemize} \end{itemize}
\centering \centering
\includegraphics[height=4cm,keepaspectratio]{delayMonitoring} \includegraphics[height=4cm,keepaspectratio]{../../figures/robustness/delayMonitoring.ps}
\end{frame} \end{frame}
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
\section{DISCUSSION (OHMG)} \section{DISCUSSION (OHMG)}
\subsection{Oh, My God !!!} \subsection{Oh, My God !!!}
......
Markdown is supported
0% or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment