... | @@ -47,14 +47,19 @@ Delay, WorldFIP master and other FMC mezzanines. |
... | @@ -47,14 +47,19 @@ Delay, WorldFIP master and other FMC mezzanines. |
|
- HPC would be interesting for some applications like high-speed
|
|
- HPC would be interesting for some applications like high-speed
|
|
ADCs where you need to go massively parallel to avoid too high
|
|
ADCs where you need to go massively parallel to avoid too high
|
|
bandwidth requirements on the data lines.
|
|
bandwidth requirements on the data lines.
|
|
- Makes that large FPGA should be used
|
|
- Test and debug using a [Xilinx FMC-XM105 debug
|
|
|
|
card](https://www.xilinx.com/products/boards-and-kits/hw-fmc-xm105-g.html)
|
|
|
|
- For footprint compatible FPGA's; if a larger FPGA is mounted then IO
|
|
|
|
pins are available as much as possible. For a smaller FPGA at least
|
|
|
|
the LPC pins on the HCP connector will be available.
|
|
- HPC: need new tests tools for production test
|
|
- HPC: need new tests tools for production test
|
|
|
|
|
|
Price idea:
|
|
Price idea:
|
|
|
|
|
|
- LPC ($12.68/connector), n layers, Kintex 70T FPGA
|
|
- LPC ($12.68/connector), n layers, Kintex 70T FPGA
|
|
- HPC ($20.40/connector), n+2 layers, Kintex 325T FPGA -\> 325T? 160T
|
|
- HPC ($20.40/connector), n+2 layers, Kintex 325T FPGA -\> 325T?
|
|
not large enough?
|
|
Probably a 160T is large enough for most applications (160T should
|
|
|
|
be default?)
|
|
|
|
|
|
<!-- end list -->
|
|
<!-- end list -->
|
|
|
|
|
... | | ... | |