... | @@ -91,6 +91,20 @@ METAS](https://www.ohwr.org/project/cngs-time-transfer/wikis/Documents/METAS-cal |
... | @@ -91,6 +91,20 @@ METAS](https://www.ohwr.org/project/cngs-time-transfer/wikis/Documents/METAS-cal |
|
traveling GPS to our installations ([PTB calibration at CERN and
|
|
traveling GPS to our installations ([PTB calibration at CERN and
|
|
LNGS](https://www.ohwr.org/project/cngs-time-transfer/wikis/Documents/PTB-calibration-report)).
|
|
LNGS](https://www.ohwr.org/project/cngs-time-transfer/wikis/Documents/PTB-calibration-report)).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
### What do you think of the paper [Time-of-flight between a Source and a Detector observed from a Satellite](http://arxiv.org/abs/1110.2685) by Ronald A.J. van Elburg?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The author of that paper assumes time is being measured using clocks
|
|
|
|
which are moving with respect to the detectors. This is not the case.
|
|
|
|
GPS Disciplined Oscillators (GPSDOs) indeed use signals coming from GPS
|
|
|
|
satellites to produce a clock signal, but both general and special
|
|
|
|
relativity effects are taken into account to manufacture this clock
|
|
|
|
signal. If these effects were not compensated, normal GPS applications
|
|
|
|
such as positioning of hand-held receivers would not work. Common-view
|
|
|
|
time transfer is a very well known and tested technique in the metrology
|
|
|
|
world. It is used in the production of Universal Coordinated Time (UTC)
|
|
|
|
and an effect such as that claimed in the paper would have made that
|
|
|
|
task impossible.
|
|
|
|
|
|
## Fiber length calibration
|
|
## Fiber length calibration
|
|
|
|
|
|
### Why haven't you used fiber reflectometry to measure fiber lengths?
|
|
### Why haven't you used fiber reflectometry to measure fiber lengths?
|
... | | ... | |