... | @@ -2,9 +2,9 @@ This page is a container serving as a basis for communication during the |
... | @@ -2,9 +2,9 @@ This page is a container serving as a basis for communication during the |
|
drafting process of the next version of CERN OHL. Our current choice is
|
|
drafting process of the next version of CERN OHL. Our current choice is
|
|
to split the licence in three:
|
|
to split the licence in three:
|
|
|
|
|
|
- A permissive licence called CERN-OHL-P (see draft)
|
|
|
|
- A weakly reciprocal licence called CERN-OHL-L (see draft)
|
|
|
|
- A strongly reciprocal licence called CERN-OHL-S (see draft)
|
|
- A strongly reciprocal licence called CERN-OHL-S (see draft)
|
|
|
|
- A weakly reciprocal licence called CERN-OHL-L (see draft)
|
|
|
|
- A permissive licence called CERN-OHL-P (see draft)
|
|
|
|
|
|
There was a demand for a permissive option in CERN OHL, and including it
|
|
There was a demand for a permissive option in CERN OHL, and including it
|
|
as an exception in the main licence text proved a bit cumbersome. Once
|
|
as an exception in the main licence text proved a bit cumbersome. Once
|
... | @@ -289,7 +289,7 @@ has the right to make them available to the public. |
... | @@ -289,7 +289,7 @@ has the right to make them available to the public. |
|
|
|
|
|
## Questions on licence compatibility
|
|
## Questions on licence compatibility
|
|
|
|
|
|
#### Q: Is CERN OHL compatible with GPL?
|
|
#### Q: Is CERN-OHL-S compatible with GPL?
|
|
|
|
|
|
A: No. From the rationale document:
|
|
A: No. From the rationale document:
|
|
|
|
|
... | | ... | |