... | @@ -189,15 +189,15 @@ designs. |
... | @@ -189,15 +189,15 @@ designs. |
|
|
|
|
|
#### Q: An ASIC design is licensed under CERN-OHL-S or CERN-OHL-L. What are the implications regarding proprietary primitives and macros used in the design?
|
|
#### Q: An ASIC design is licensed under CERN-OHL-S or CERN-OHL-L. What are the implications regarding proprietary primitives and macros used in the design?
|
|
|
|
|
|
This case is slightly more complicated than the one for FPGA designs. We
|
|
This case is more complicated than the one for FPGA designs. We have not
|
|
did not find good wording to make sure the primitive libraries (e.g. the
|
|
yet found good wording to make sure the primitive libraries (e.g. the
|
|
so-called [PDKs](https://en.wikipedia.org/wikis/Process_design_kit))
|
|
so-called [PDKs](https://en.wikipedia.org/wikis/Process_design_kit) and
|
|
were excluded from the distribution obligations. Not excluding them
|
|
[standard cell](https://en.wikipedia.org/wikis/Standard_cell) libraries)
|
|
would make the licences applicable in only an extremely reduced number
|
|
are excluded from the distribution obligations. Not excluding them would
|
|
of cases. In the end we decided to allow the original Licensor to mark
|
|
make the licences applicable in only an extremely reduced number of
|
|
some components as "Available Components" so that the PDK case and
|
|
cases. Finding appropriate wording to make them qualify as "Available
|
|
others can be easily
|
|
Components" is high in our
|
|
covered.
|
|
agenda.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#### Q: Is an FPGA bitstream a Product according to the definition of Product in CERN OHL?
|
|
#### Q: Is an FPGA bitstream a Product according to the definition of Product in CERN OHL?
|
|
|
|
|
... | | ... | |