Commit 5e85e73f authored by Alessandro Rubini's avatar Alessandro Rubini

doc/wrs-todo: the tools are renamed now

Signed-off-by: Alessandro Rubini's avatarAlessandro Rubini <rubini@gnudd.com>
parent c0e34f70
...@@ -347,14 +347,6 @@ GrandMaster. ...@@ -347,14 +347,6 @@ GrandMaster.
@itemize @bullet @itemize @bullet
@item Tool naming is completely inconsistent. We should move everything
to use unambiguous naming: @t{wr_} for every wr-wide item, and @t{wrsw_}
for every switch-specific thing. (Actually, @t{wrs_} would be better,
as it doesn't look like ``software'' and we use wrs/wrn internally already,
but several tools use @t{wrsw_} as a prefix already.
We fixed the ``shower'' name -- (@t{shw_ver}: switch hardware version),
but more are there. (@b{Update}: Greg says to use @t{wrs_} and do it soon).
@item A number of tools @t{mmap()} FPGA memory, but there is no @item A number of tools @t{mmap()} FPGA memory, but there is no
locking so it is (remotely) possible for tools to interfere and get locking so it is (remotely) possible for tools to interfere and get
wrong results. We should define a good policy with proper locking, to wrong results. We should define a good policy with proper locking, to
......
Markdown is supported
0% or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment