Skip to content

  • Projects
  • Groups
  • Snippets
  • Help
    • Loading...
  • Sign in
W
White Rabbit
  • Project
    • Project
    • Details
    • Activity
    • Cycle Analytics
  • Repository
    • Repository
    • Files
    • Commits
    • Branches
    • Tags
    • Contributors
    • Graph
    • Compare
    • Charts
  • Issues 5
    • Issues 5
    • List
    • Board
    • Labels
    • Milestones
  • Merge Requests 0
    • Merge Requests 0
  • Wiki
    • Wiki
  • image/svg+xml
    Discourse
    • Discourse
  • Members
    • Members
  • Collapse sidebar
  • Activity
  • Graph
  • Charts
  • Create a new issue
  • Commits
  • Issue Boards
  • Projects
  • White Rabbit
  • Wiki
  • Non compliantsfp

Non compliantsfp

Last edited by Erik van der Bij Sep 07, 2020
Page history

Back to Compliant SFP types

Non-compliant SFP types

White Rabbit standard SFP types

1310/1490nm single strand

White Rabbit should follow the 1000BASE-BX10 standard and use 1310/1490nm pairs with a single LC connector. See SFP for compatible types.



Non-compliant SFP types


1550/1490nm - single strand - 80 km

FS.com

  • SFP-GE-BX80 1550nm-TX/1490nm-RX 80km #49481
  • SFP-GE-BX80 1490nm-TX/1550nm-RX 80 km #49480

Note that both sides have the same type SFP-GE-BX80. This is also the case on the images on the website of FS. Makes sure to use the order numbers #49481/#49480.

See post BX10 link budget? monitoring Rx optical power? (AW, March 2020) and note on 1310/1490nm below.

1310/1490nm single strand

This type works, but as the EEPROM data does not allow to distinguish the -U and -D sides, the WRS cannot correctly set the delay parameters. Therefore they are more difficult to use in White Rabbit installations.

Despite the price of these SFPs is rather low please be aware that VN of both mentioned SFPs is the same. It is (almost) impossible to distinguish these two SFPs (which has TX 1490nm) and apply correct calibration values. Even worse, there are kinds of SFPs from this manufacturer that are impossible to distinguish at all. For example:

  • http://www.fs.com/products/29894.html
  • http://www.fs.com/products/29892.html

For both TX wavelength is the same (1310nm), but RX differs (1490nm vs 1550nm). The content of EEPROM is almost the same. The same VN, VS and even TX wavelength (in DOM area). SFP's EEPROM contains VN, VS, SN and TX wavelength (in DOM area), but not RX wavelength. Right now we check only VN, VS and SN during the SFP matching.

**** Transmitting Downstream Transmitting Upstream Comment
Brand Switch (WR Master) End node (WR Slave)
fs.com
feisu (Chinese)
Generic Compatible 1000BASE-BX 1490nm-TX/1310nm-RX, firmware no.2 Generic Compatible 1000BASE-BX 1310nm-TX/1490nm-RX, firmware no.2 identical 'calib.sfp.part_num' (as of Sept 2017), modules indistinguishable for WR switch

In our testbench, there are 8 WR nodes and 1 WR switch. They are working well for about two weeks with full UDP bandwidth and WR protocol. We also tested the temperature coefficient of these SFPs, which is almost the same with the SFPs produced by AXCEN. From mail on wr-dev mailing list.


1550/1310nm - single strand

The following SFP transceivers use 1550/1310nm, which is not compliant to the 1000BASE-BX10 standard. Therefore they should not be used in White Rabbit installations.

Brand Switch side Node side Remarks
Optoway SPB-7710LG SPB-7610LG wavelengths 1550/1310nm instead of 1490/1310nm (Tom)
TP-Link TL-SM321A TL-SM321B wavelengths 1550/1310nm instead of 1490/1310nm (Achim)

1270/1330nm - single strand

Out of curiosity we made a preliminary test using 10 Gbit/s SFP+ transcievers from fs.com specified at 1330nm and 1270nm (we got their 40km models). Measured in wavelength, this TX-RX spacing is 60nm, or 3-fold closer than the ‘standard’ BX10 SFPs at 1490/1310. However the zero-dispersion wavelength is somewhere around 1300nm, which has an effect on asymmetry.

Our preliminary result using the fs.com SFP+ BiDirs on 1330/1270nm on a 40km test-spool-fiber in the lab is an asymmetry-coefficient (alpha) of ~14 PPM. This is almost 18-fold lower than with BX10 (different fibers seem to cluster around 250 PPM with BX10).

I’d be interested in hearing if other people have tried SFP+ BiDirs and what economical and easily available choices there are for low-asymmetry links.

See Forum entry "14 PPM asymmetry with 1330/1270nm SFP+ optics" (September 2020)

Brand Switch side Node side Remarks
FS SFP-10G-BX40/#19358 1330nm-TX/1270nm-RX SFP-10G-BX40/#19359 1270nm-TX/1330nm-RX 40km reach 10GBASE-LR/LW full-duplex on SMF single strand.
Wavelengths 1270/1330 nm instead of 1490/1310nm (Erik)

1271/1331nm - single strand

The following SFP transceivers use 1271/1331nm DFB laser, which is not compliant to the 1000BASE-BX10 standard, but with 10GBASE-LR/LW. Therefore they should not be used in White Rabbit installations. However, for specific applications where it is important to have a much closer spacing of the wavelengths, it may be interesting to use these types.

Brand Switch side Node side Remarks
Finisar FTLX2071D3xx FTLX2071D3xx 10km reach 10GBASE-LR/LW full-duplex on SMF single strand.
Wavelengths 1271/1331 nm instead of 1490/1310nm (Erik)

1470nm to 1610nm in 20nm steps - dual strand

The following SFP transceivers use DFB lasers with wavelengths from 1470nm to 1610nm in 20nm steps* (selected on purchase). This is not compliant to the 1000BASE-BX10 standard, but with 1000BASE-ZX or other speeds. Therefore they should not be used in White Rabbit installations. However, for specific applications where it is important to have a specific wavelength to be sent over CWDM networks (coarse wavelength division multiplexing), it may be interesting to use these types.
Some types are even specified for a transmission over 120 km.

Brand SFP Remarks Users
ATOP CWDM SFP 1470nm to 1610nm in 20nm steps - dual strand
Distributor: c-dis
Stable Technology Co., Ltd STABLESC125xxCDL120 CWDM Optical Transceiver 120 km, dual strand
Distributor: c-dis VSL (see below)
Eoptolink SFP DWDM transceiver: 1.25G, LC, DDM, 28 dB, 1529.55 nm dual strand
(Merimaa) MIKES

VSL in Delft, The Netherlands (E.Dierikx) have used in August 2014 the following SFPs for a link running 120km. Note that they use special light amplifiers halfway the link. For the optical path between the WRS and WR Slave 2, these SFPs are used that can cover longer distances:

- In the WRS: Stable Technology Co., Ltd, 1.25G SFP 120Km CWDM Optical Transceiver (part no: STABLESC125xxCDL120, Tx 1490, Rx 1270-1600)
- In WR Slave 2: Stable Technology Co., Ltd, 1.25G SFP 120Km CWDM Optical Transceiver (part no: STABLESC125xxCDL120, Tx 1470, Rx 1270-1600)

The SFPs have two LC connectors; one for Tx and one for Rx. This means that the first part of the fibre path (both at the master and at the slave) needs to be a fibre pair. This fibre pair goes to a 2:1 CWDM multiplexer or demultiplexer. These MUX and DEMUX devices are from Stable Technology. These devices are ordered for the wavelengths 1470 and 1490 nm.

In the lab experiment, the signal from the MUX on the master side goes into a 5 km fibre spool and is attenuated by another 20 dB and then goes into the DEMUX on the slave side (later this fibre spool and attenuator was replaced with the fibre link that goes to Amsterdam). Note that it is important to have sufficient attenuation in the test link. The laser power from these 120 km SFPs is quite strong and may damage the photo diode on the receiver side!


Achim Vollhardt, Erik van der Bij - 7 September 2020

Files

  • 2013_SFP_1.25G_120KM_CWDM_Specification.pdf
Clone repository
  • Data delivery
  • Documents
  • Documents
    • Articles
    • Faq documents
    • Fpga transceivers propagation delay study
    • Figures
    • Greg's master thesis
    • Posters
    • Presentations
    • Sfp data
    • Temperature tests (aka torture report)
    • Tom's master thesis
    • Wr jobs
    • Wr switch debugging
  • Documents/WR-contribution-for-ITU-T-Q13
    • 15 meeting
More Pages

New Wiki Page

Tip: You can specify the full path for the new file. We will automatically create any missing directories.