1. 03 Aug, 2017 1 commit
  2. 28 Jul, 2017 1 commit
  3. 26 Jul, 2017 1 commit
  4. 24 Jul, 2017 1 commit
  5. 21 Jul, 2017 3 commits
  6. 20 Jul, 2017 2 commits
    • Sven Meier's avatar
      bmc & wr locking: added leap second propagation and added reset of locking · bc586acd
      Sven Meier authored
      Leap seconds are now also fetched from the system in case we are a grandmaster
      A reset of the locking procedure was added so a locked switch can get master again
      bc586acd
    • Sven Meier's avatar
      bmc & cleanup: fixes after the audit portings · 8633ced3
      Sven Meier authored
      The audit portings changed the timely behaviour of the ppsi which cause wrong behaviours,
      the timeout scheme was changed to only reset timeouts where needed and in all non PTP
      states. UTC offset is now fetched from the system where supported, link up/down is now
      considered in the BMC, also some state changes where cleaned up to be out of the BMC, e.g.
      state changes based on timeouts between PreMaster and Master or between Uncalibrated and Slave.
      8633ced3
  7. 12 Jul, 2017 17 commits
  8. 06 Jul, 2017 1 commit
  9. 03 Jul, 2017 1 commit
  10. 29 Jun, 2017 2 commits
  11. 23 Jun, 2017 3 commits
  12. 12 Jun, 2017 3 commits
    • Alessandro Rubini's avatar
      pdelay: rework and extend prev commit · 31f08f19
      Alessandro Rubini authored
      The previous commit is not enough as a fix.  This may happen:
      
          - we invalidate stamps after processing them
          - we send request
          - get reply, loose reply-fup
          - send request
          - loose reply, get f-up
      
      So we now invalidate when sending the request. And invalidate t4 alone
      as the beautifulness and symmetry of the previous commit is lost
      anyways.
      
      Note: there no need to invalidate stamps in e2e mode, because checking
      the sequence number to validate RX frames is enough.  But here all
      replies match the sequence number, so the problem is not caught and
      stamps from different tuples are mixed.
      
      Example beofre this commit, with trimmed stamps (was 1497283863):
      
         diag-frames-1-wr1: SENT 54 bytes at 863.333173928 (pdelay_req)
         diag-frames-1-wr1: RECV 54 bytes at 863.334158796 (type 3, pdelay_resp)
         diag-frames-1-wr1: Drop received frame
         diag-frames-1-wr1: SENT 54 bytes at 864.479336104 (pdelay_req)
         diag-frames-1-wr1: Drop received frame
         diag-frames-1-wr1: RECV 54 bytes at 864.481095164 (type a, presp_follow_up)
      
         diag-servo-2-wr1: servo:t3 = 864:479336104:0
         diag-servo-2-wr1: servo:t4 = 863:333174267:586
         diag-servo-2-wr1: servo:t5 = 864:480295312:0
         diag-servo-2-wr1: servo:t6 = 863:334158796:773
         diag-servo-2-wr1: ->mdelay = -2:-292298352:359
      Signed-off-by: Alessandro Rubini's avatarAlessandro Rubini <rubini@gnudd.com>
      31f08f19
    • Alessandro Rubini's avatar
      pdelay: mark stamps as invalid after use · 223459dd
      Alessandro Rubini authored
      The code is checking the sequence number of pdelay-rep and
      pdelay-rep-fup, but we may miss the reply and get the f-up.
      
      The result was something like this (first tuple is ok, next is wrong):
      
         diag-servo-2-wr1: servo:t3 = 1497279009:22584224:0
         diag-servo-2-wr1: servo:t4 = 1497279009:22584574:759
         diag-servo-2-wr1: servo:t5 = 1497279009:23564032:0
         diag-servo-2-wr1: servo:t6 = 1497279009:23564365:547
         diag-servo-2-wr1: ->mdelay = 0:684:306
      
         diag-servo-2-wr1: servo:t3 = 1497279009:663586672:0
         diag-servo-2-wr1: servo:t4 = 1497279009:22584574:759
         diag-servo-2-wr1: servo:t5 = 1497279009:683142000:0
         diag-servo-2-wr1: servo:t6 = 1497279009:23564365:547
         diag-servo-2-wr1: ->mdelay = -1:-300579732:306
      
      Here, t4 and t6 are old. The former is the receipt of the request,
      send back to the "slave" in the pdelay-reply payload; the latter is
      the receive time of such frame.
      
      We now invalidate t4 and t5 when using the tuple. They are the two
      "remote" times, one sent back in the response and the other sent back
      in the response-fup.
      Signed-off-by: Alessandro Rubini's avatarAlessandro Rubini <rubini@gnudd.com>
      223459dd
    • Alessandro Rubini's avatar
      dfeb1890
  13. 06 Apr, 2017 2 commits
  14. 05 Apr, 2017 2 commits