[wr-switch-sw] wiki issues
Main page
- in the "Roadmap for software releases table" the links ** v4.2 ** ** v5.0 ** ** v5.0.1 ** link to some fmc-vme-carrier news
- the "Roadmap for software releases" looks too long for main page; maybe in a separate? but that's just an opinion:)
- in status table, should there be a link to the release "10-07-2013
Release 4.0rc1, release-candidate for 4.0 sw/gw on 3.3 hardware" ?
Release-v5.0.1 page
- There's a stray * in this sentence: "This firmware release contains software hotfixes to v5.0 release.*"
- There's a stray * in this sentence: "* You can build the v5.0.1 release firmware or download the already
built"
- broken link: "the list of solved issues for WR
Switch software"
- remove "Grzegorz Daniluk - 25 August 2017" at the bottom of the page
Release-v5.0 page
- There's a stray * in this sentence: "This firmware release may be used only on WR Switch hardware with the
LX240T Virtex 6 FPGA.*"
- There's a stray * in this sentence: "* You can build the v5.0 release firmware or download the already built"
- remove "Grzegorz Daniluk - 16 December 2016" at the bottom of the page
Release-v4.2 page
- There's a stray * in this sentence: "This firmware release may be used only on WR Switch hardware with the
LX240T Virtex 6 FPGA.*"
- There's a stray * in this sentence: "* You can build the v4.2 release firmware or download the already built"
- remove "Grzegorz Daniluk - 28 August 2015" at the bottom of the page
Release-v4.1 page
- There's a stray * in this sentence: "This firmware release may be used only on WR Switch hardware with the
LX240T Virtex 6 FPGA.*"
- There's a stray * in this sentence: "* You can build the v4.1 release firmware or download the already built"
- remove "Grzegorz Daniluk - 12 December 2014" at the bottom of the page
Release-v4.0.1 page
- There's a stray * in this sentence: "This firmware release may be used only on WR Switch hardware with the
LX240T Virtex 6 FPGA.*"
- There's a stray * in this sentence: "* You can build the v4.0.1 release firmware or download the already built"
- remove "Grzegorz Daniluk - 19 August 2014" at the bottom of the page
Release-v4.0 page
- There's a stray * in this sentence: "This firmware release may be used only on WR Switch hardware with the
LX240T Virtex 6 FPGA.*"
- There's a stray * in this sentence: "* You can build the v4.0 release firmware or download the already built"
- remove "Grzegorz Daniluk - 8 August 2014" at the bottom of the page
Release-v3.3 page
- Some single line sentences start with a bullet, others not
- remove "Grzegorz Daniluk - 26 July 2013" at the bottom of the page
Release-v3.1 page
Release-v3.0 page
Previous-releases page
WRS-versions page
- remove "6 January 2017" at the bottom of the page
FAQ page
- add list of contents, to ease readability
- some answers mention author's name, some not, some have "??" in front of author's names and some have company and date information
- in the answer of the question "Q: We need to use 30m coaxial cable from the GPS to the WRS Grandmaster 10MHz/PPS signals and the cable will see strong temperature changes (15-35ºC)." the link references [1], [2], [3] have the link next to them and also at the end of the text
- in the answer of the question "Q: Is the WR Switch inter-operable with standard PTP (IEEE1588-2008) gear?" there is a stray bullet point
- in the answer of the question "Q: Can the WR Switch handle Jumbo frames?" there's a broken wikipedia link Jumbo Frame
- in the answer of the question "Q: What is a possible problem if I see losses of Ethernet Frames when connecting to non-WR devices, even with reasonable data rates?" there is twice the broken link: issue
- in the answer of the question "Q: There are two fans. Is it correct that both of them push the air out of the box on backside?" the link to the White Rabbit Switch Hardware project would better be the main wiki page
- in the answer of the question "Q: in the repository there are different branches. Which one should I take?" there could be a text describing the link like White Rabbit Switch Hardware
- in the answer of the question "Q: How fast is the overall performance within the WR switch fpga? Is it really 181Gbps? As an example: When I establish a connection between port1 and port2 with 1 Gb/s is it possible for port3 also to communicate with port4 with 1Gb/s? Is it still possible for each connection to communicate at full speed?*" on the link: issue mention the issue number issue #22