Skip to content

  • Projects
  • Groups
  • Snippets
  • Help
    • Loading...
  • Sign in
C
CERN Open Hardware Licence
  • Project
    • Project
    • Details
    • Activity
    • Cycle Analytics
  • Repository
    • Repository
    • Files
    • Commits
    • Branches
    • Tags
    • Contributors
    • Graph
    • Compare
    • Charts
  • Issues 26
    • Issues 26
    • List
    • Board
    • Labels
    • Milestones
  • Merge Requests 0
    • Merge Requests 0
  • Wiki
    • Wiki
  • image/svg+xml
    Discourse
    • Discourse
  • Members
    • Members
  • Collapse sidebar
  • Activity
  • Graph
  • Charts
  • Create a new issue
  • Commits
  • Issue Boards
  • Projects
  • CERN Open Hardware Licence
  • Issues
  • #1

Closed
Open
Opened Mar 19, 2019 by Tristan Gingold@tgingold
  • Report abuse
  • New issue
Report abuse New issue

Complete Source definition

As a non lawyer, I don't feel comfortable with the definition of Complete Source, as the extent of it is not clearly defined. Building a product may require a know-how, or parameters (like tolerances, precision...) that is not always easily expressed.

Honestly I don't see any universal solution to this problem.

Maybe the Licensor could specify what is the Complete Source. For example if I draw the schematics of an electronic design, the Complete Source of the product would be the schematics (of course), but also the PCB design, the BOM...

Assignee
Assign to
None
Milestone
None
Assign milestone
Time tracking
None
Due date
No due date
0
Labels
None
Assign labels
  • View project labels
Reference: project/cernohl#1